When to use Time-Weighted Rate of Return and when to use Money-Weighted Rate of Return?
The book says that when the management has control of the cash flow, we should use money-weighted rate of return and if he/she has NO controlĀ of the cash flow, we should use time-weighted rate of return.
What is the meaning of “control of the cash flow”? And why it is said so?
February 3rd, 2009 in
CFA - LEVEL 1, Question Posted by vidas
Hi Vidas,
Yes, “control of the cash flow” is a crucial point. To evaluate the ability of a portfolio manager, the best way is to measure the growth rate of the funds he/she manages. However, for some funds, they don’t have full control of the cash flows, meaning that the clients may request to withdraw money (e.g. redeem) or invest extra into the funds at their wills. The withdrawal or injection of cash can be timed badly (e.g. withdrawal before the market performs well or injection before the market collapses). This is “out of control” by the fund managers. So it is not fair to measure the growth rate by the money-weighted return (IRR) because badly-timed injection or withdrawal (especially in large amount) will make the whole all performance very bad.
On the contrast, if the manager has control of the cash flow (e.g. his decision to pay cash back to investor as he’s seeing a market collapsing), we should use money-weighted return.
Please refer to the followings videos for more information:
http://minute-class.com/finance/time-weighted-rate-of-return/ http://minute-class.com/finance/money-weighted-rate-of-return/